Can the EU achieve battery self-sufficiency in the coming years? Dr. Nikolaos Arvanitidis, Economic Geologist, provides interesting data to support that achieving the EU's midstream and downstream targets by 2030 is highly ambitious and will be a significant challenge. While significant progress is being made in building battery cell plants, the critical "midstream" processing of materials represents a major bottleneck. The 12% target for lithium processing is likely connected to the EU's goal for domestic lithium processing under the CRMA while the broader ambition for the EU is to have a largely self-sufficient battery value chain by 2030.
EU's strategic framework and recycling targets
To understand the specific projects, it's essential to be aware of the EU's overarching strategy. The Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) sets clear 2030 benchmarks for the bloc (Figure 1):
- Extraction (Mining): At least 10% of annual EU consumption.
- Processing: At least 40% of annual EU consumption.
- Recycling: At least 25% of annual EU consumption.
The Batteries Regulation provides strict, legally binding targets for recycling performance that ramp up over time. These are calculated based on the weight of materials recovered from waste batteries.

Figure 1: The 2030 benchmarks targeted by the EU Critical Raw Materials Act
Related key recycling targets
- Lithium recycling rate: Must reach 70% by the end of 2030.
- Lithium material recovery: Must reach 80% by the end of 2031.
- Other key materials: Recovery rates for cobalt, copper, lead, and nickel must hit 95% by the end of 2031
Value chain targets and progress assessment
Here is a breakdown of the targets and the current outlook for each segment of the value chain by 2030 (Figure 2).
Figure 2: The domains of lithium, and other battery minerals (e.g., cobalt, nickel, graphite), that end up with battery and electric car manufacturing
- Midstream processing (e.g., producing cathode/anode active material)
-
- EU 2030 ambition: Capture 25% of the global battery market; secure domestic processing for key materials.
- Current outlook: Significant risk of shortfall. A major capacity gap exists. For example, projected European cathode active material (CAM) production will only cover about 76% of the needed battery cell capacity in 2030, leaving a 24% gap.
- Primary challenge: Heavy reliance on imports from China for processed battery-grade materials (Figure 3). Building competitive, large-scale chemical processing plants in Europe is capital-intensive and faces higher energy costs.
- Downstream battery manufacturing
-
- EU 2030 ambition: Cover EU consumption needs with domestic production.
- Current outlook: More achievable, but with delays. Cell manufacturing capacity is being built aggressively. However, these "gigafactories" remain dependent on imported midstream materials, creating supply vulnerability.
- Primary challenge: Delays in factory ramp-up due to equipment and skilled labour shortages. The success of downstream is directly tied to solving the midstream bottleneck.
- Upstream mining and recycling
-
- EU 2030 ambition: Source at least 10% of lithium from within Europe.
- Current outlook: Moderate progress with bottlenecks. Several mining projects are advancing in Finland, Portugal, Germany, and Serbia. Recycling is identified as the fastest-growing lithium source and is crucial for long-term supply.
- Primary challenge: Strong environmental and social opposition to new mines, leading to complex permitting and long delays.
Figure 3: China controls the global lithium battery (as well as other battery minerals) value chains, used in electric car manufacturing (Source: The EV battery supply chain is dependent on China and Russia, https://www.interos.ai/)
Major obstacles to overcome
For the EU to have any chance of meeting its 2030 goals, it must address these interconnected challenges:
- The midstream bottleneck: This is the single greatest vulnerability. Without local capacity to turn raw lithium into high-purity battery chemicals, the EU's cell factories will remain dependent on Asian supply chains.
- Global competition for investment: The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act offers massive subsidies, pulling investment toward North America. The EU's response, the Green Deal Industrial Plan, has less specific funding for batteries.
- Supply chain complexity: From 2027, strict "rules of origin" will require a significant portion of a battery's value to come from the EU/UK to avoid tariffs. Meeting these rules requires a fully localised midstream, which currently doesn't exist.
- Mineral raw material shortages: Global demand for lithium is expected to outstrip supply in the late 2020s. Even with recycling, the EU is likely to remain import-reliant for key raw materials such as cobalt and nickel.
Strategic pathways forward
The EU's strategy to overcome these bottlenecks rests on several pillars:
- Legislation and funding: The Critical Raw Materials Act aims to fast-track permits for strategic projects and set binding targets for domestic processing. Public funding through instruments like IPCEI is supporting giga-factory development.
- Circular economy focus: The new Batteries Regulation mandates high recycling rates and recycled content in new batteries. By 2040, recycling could supply over 40% of the EU's demand for nickel and cobalt.
- Innovation and sustainability: Major research initiatives like Battery 2030+ focus on next-generation batteries (e.g., solid-state). There is also a push for sustainable mining and low-carbon refining, such as utilizing geothermal energy for lithium extraction.
Highlighting issues
- Downstream battery manufacturing capacity is on track to be largely achieved by 2030; however, midstream processing remains the critical weak link that threatens the entire ambition.
- The 12% target for lithium processing is a step. Still, the overall goal of a resilient, EU-controlled battery value chain by 2030 is at serious risk unless there is a massive, coordinated, and accelerated effort to build the midstream chemical industry.
What about mining projects in Portugal and Serbia, as well as recycling?
Mining in Portugal: Advanced but facing scrutiny
Portugal hosts Europe's largest lithium reserves and has multiple projects designated as "Strategic Projects" under the CRMA. This status aims to streamline permitting and improve access to finance.
- Status and progress of key projects
-
- Strategic recognition: Four Portuguese projects (three lithium, one copper) were among the first 47 EU-wide projects granted this status in March 2025.
- Key lithium projects
-
- Barroso project (Savannah Resources): One of the most advanced lithium projects in Western Europe.
- Romano Mine (Lusorecursos) and Lift One (Lithium Energy): Also designated as strategic.
- Major Challenges
-
- Environmental and Social License: Projects face significant public concern regarding water use, pollution, and impacts on local communities and agriculture. This is a major factor influencing the speed of development.
Mining in Serbia: Geopolitically vital but highly controversial
The Jadar Valley project, operated by Rio Tinto, is one of Europe's largest potential lithium sources. However, its path has been turbulent.
- Status and geopolitical role
-
- Project Scale: Could meet 10-15% of Europe's total lithium demand by 2030.
- EU partnership: Serbia (an EU candidate country) signed a strategic raw materials partnership with the EU in July 2024, with Jadar as its centerpiece.
- Geopolitical driver: The EU sees this as key to diversifying supply away from China and building influence in the Balkans.

Figure 4: The controversial lithium mineral project in Jadar which is part of a EU-Serbia strategic partnership (Source: Mikhail Korostikov, https://reunir-horizon.eu/serbias-dillema-the-pros-and-cons-of-serbia-eu-lithium-partnership/)
- Major challenges
-
- Intense local opposition: The project has sparked massive, sustained protests in Serbia since 2020 over environmental fears, lack of transparency, and concerns over land rights (Figure 4).
- Political and governance risks: Serbia's government has been criticized for weakening democratic institutions and the rule of law. There are concerns that the partnership may overlook these issues for resource access, creating reputational risk for the EU.
- Legal uncertainty: The project's permits were revoked in 2022 after protests, then reinstated in 2024 by a controversial court decision, highlighting its fragile legal standing.
Recycling: A Regulatory leader with scaling needs
The EU has established a world-leading regulatory framework for battery recycling, but industrial capacity must grow to meet ambitious targets.
- Status and regulatory framework
-
- Clear rules: New detailed EU rules on calculating recycling efficiency and material recovery took effect in July 2025, creating a level playing field for recyclers.
- Binding targets: The Batteries Regulation sets escalating, legally binding targets for recycling rates and material recovery through 2031.
- Major challenges
-
- Scaling capacity: Meeting the 25% EU consumption from recycling CRMA target by 2030 requires a major, rapid scale-up of collection and high-tech recycling facilities across member states.
- Logistics and collection: Building efficient EU-wide systems to collect end-of-life batteries from various sources (EVs, electronics) is a complex, foundational task.
Summary: Progress and obstacles to 2030 goals
The outlook for each sector in relation to the EU 2030 ambitions is summarised below:
- Sector - EU 2030 Goal - Current status and key challenge
-
- Portuguese mining - Contribute to 10% EU extraction - Moderate Progress. Projects are strategically recognized but need to secure social and environmental licenses to operate amid public scrutiny.
- Serbian Mining (Jadar) - Diversify supply, cover ~10-15% demand - High risk and uncertainty. Geopolitically important but faces massive local opposition and political risks that threaten its viability.
- Recycling - Supply 25% of EU consumption - Regulations set, scaling needed. Has a leading regulatory framework with binding targets but requires massive investment in industrial capacity and collection logistics.
Conclusions
Based on the available information, the European Union's progress toward establishing a secure battery value chain by 2030 presents a mixed and highly challenging outlook. The ambitious goals, particularly the Critical Raw Materials Act target for the EU to supply 25% of its annual consumption from recycling, face significant hurdles across different segments of the chain.
The most critical vulnerability for the battery value chain remains in midstream processing, where a severe capacity gap threatens to leave downstream battery cell manufacturing dependent on imported materials. While downstream gigafactory construction is advancing, though with some delays, the lack of large-scale, local facilities to produce battery-grade chemicals like cathode active material is a major bottleneck. Even if mining and recycling hit their targets, a lack of European refineries to turn raw or recycled materials into battery-grade chemicals would maintain dependence on foreign suppliers.
Portugal's mining sector is on a more institutionalized EU path, while Serbia's Jadar project represents a high-risk, high-reward geopolitical gamble for the EU. Recycling is the most stable pillar, with strong laws in place, but its success hinges on rapid industrial scale-up.
In upstream mining, progress is uneven. In Portugal, home to Europe's largest lithium reserves, several projects have been designated as "Strategic" to fast-track development, but they continue to face intense public scrutiny and must secure a social and environmental license to operate. The situation in Serbia's Jadar Valley is even more complex; while the project could meet a substantial portion of Europe's lithium demand and is central to a strategic EU partnership, it is mired in massive local opposition, political risk, and legal uncertainty, casting serious doubt on its timely realization.
Conversely, the recycling sector is built on the world's most advanced regulatory framework, with the new Batteries Regulation mandating a 70% lithium recycling rate by 2030. However, achieving the broader goal of supplying 25% of EU consumption from recycled sources requires an unprecedented and rapid scale-up of industrial collection and processing capacity across member states.
Overall, the EU's 2030 ambitions for a self-sufficient battery value chain are at serious risk. Success is not guaranteed and hinges on overcoming the midstream bottleneck, responsibly developing contested mining projects, and massively scaling recycling infrastructure, all within a highly competitive global investment landscape.
Cover photo credits: https://www.sgu.se/










